15 research outputs found

    Weak lensing study of 16 DAFT/FADA clusters: substructures and filaments

    Full text link
    While our current cosmological model places galaxy clusters at the nodes of a filament network (the cosmic web), we still struggle to detect these filaments at high redshifts. We perform a weak lensing study for a sample of 16 massive, medium-high redshift (0.4<z<0.9) galaxy clusters from the DAFT/FADA survey, that are imaged in at least three optical bands with Subaru/Suprime-Cam or CFHT/MegaCam. We estimate the cluster masses using an NFW fit to the shear profile measured in a KSB-like method, adding our contribution to the calibration of the observable-mass relation required for cluster abundance cosmological studies. We compute convergence maps and select structures within, securing their detection with noise re-sampling techniques. Taking advantage of the large field of view of our data, we study cluster environment, adding information from galaxy density maps at the cluster redshift and from X-ray images when available. We find that clusters show a large variety of weak lensing maps at large scales and that they may all be embedded in filamentary structures at megaparsec scale. We classify them in three categories according to the smoothness of their weak lensing contours and to the amount of substructures: relaxed (~7%), past mergers (~21.5%), recent or present mergers (~71.5%). The fraction of clusters undergoing merging events observationally supports the hierarchical scenario of cluster growth, and implies that massive clusters are strongly evolving at the studied redshifts. Finally, we report the detection of unusually elongated structures in CLJ0152, MACSJ0454, MACSJ0717, A851, BMW1226, MACSJ1621, and MS1621.Comment: 25 pages, accepted for publication in A&

    When the Well Runs Dry: Modeling Environmental Quenching of High-mass Satellites in Massive Clusters at \boldmathz1z \gtrsim 1

    Full text link
    We explore models of massive (>1010 M\gt 10^{10}~{\rm M}_{\odot}) satellite quenching in massive clusters at z1z\gtrsim1 using an MCMC framework, focusing on two primary parameters: RquenchR_{\rm quench} (the host-centric radius at which quenching begins) and τquench\tau_{\rm quench} (the timescale upon which a satellite quenches after crossing RquenchR_{\rm quench}). Our MCMC analysis shows two local maxima in the 1D posterior probability distribution of RquenchR_{\rm quench} at approximately 0.250.25 and 1.0 R2001.0~R_{\rm{200}}. Analyzing four distinct solutions in the τquench\tau_{\rm quench}-RquenchR_{\rm quench} parameter space, nearly all of which yield quiescent fractions consistent with observational data from the GOGREEN survey, we investigate whether these solutions represent distinct quenching pathways and find that they can be separated between \textquote{starvation} and \textquote{core quenching} scenarios. The starvation pathway is characterized by quenching timescales that are roughly consistent with the total cold gas (H2_{2}+H{\scriptsize I}) depletion timescale at intermediate zz, while core quenching is characterized by satellites with relatively high line-of-sight velocities that quench on short timescales (0.25\sim 0.25 Gyr) after reaching the inner region of the cluster (<0.30 R200\lt 0.30~R_{\rm{200}}). Lastly, we break the degeneracy between these solutions by comparing the observed properties of transition galaxies from the GOGREEN survey. We conclude that only the \textquote{starvation} pathway is consistent with the projected phase-space distribution and relative abundance of transition galaxies at z1z \sim 1. However, we acknowledge that ram pressure might contribute as a secondary quenching mechanism.Comment: 15 pages; 8 figures; Accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societ

    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Get PDF
    In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure fl ux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defi ned as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (inmost higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium ) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the fi eld understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation it is imperative to delete or knock down more than one autophagy-related gene. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways so not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

    Les amas de galaxies dans la toile cosmique

    No full text
    As the most massive bound structures in the universe, galaxy clusters are a powerful probe of the impact of environment on galaxy evolution. In this work, I present AMASCFI, a new cluster finder algorithm using photometric redshifts I developed during the PhD and use the cluster catalogue obtained on the Canada France Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey (CFHTLS) to investigate the role played by clusters and their environment on galaxy evolution. We show the good performances of AMASCFI on Euclid and the CFHTLS using mock data. In particular AMASCFI is 90% pure and 70% complete to z<0.7 for the latter. We then apply AMASCFI to the CFHTLS T0007, and infer a mass for each detected cluster using richness as a proxy. Using our cluster catalogue, we study the redshift evolution of the galaxy luminosity functions (GLFs) of early-type (ETGs) and late-type (LTGs) galaxies at different cluster masses. We observe that the ETG GLF faint-end drops at high redshift, the red sequence (RS) being already formed at z~0.7, but enriched by faint ETGs at z<0.7. This could be due to quenching of LTGs in the cluster or accretion of faint ETGs pre-processed in infalling groups. To investigate the role of pre-processing, we use the method of Laigle et al (2018) to detect filaments from photometric redshifts and show that it allows to recover the 3D cosmic web at CFHTLS accuracy. We apply it to the CFHTLS and detect filaments around AMASCFI clusters. Studying the distances of ETGs and LTGs in these filaments to clusters, we conclude that some quenching occurs in filaments. We suggest that this might be due to strangulation in galaxy groups though we still lack conclusive evidence for such a mechanism.En tant que structures liées les plus massives de l’univers, les amas de galaxies permettent d’étudier l’influence de l’environnement sur l’évolution des galaxies. Dans ce manuscrit, je présente AMASCFI, un algorithme de détection d’amas développé durant la thèse et utilise le catalogue d’amas obtenu à partir des décalages spectraux photométriques du relevé Canada France Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey (CFHTLS) pour étudier le rôle des amas sur l’évolution des galaxies. Je démontre les bonnes performances d’AMASCFI sur Euclid et le CFHTLS à partir de données simulées. Je l’applique au CFHTLS pour lequel AMASCFI est pur à 90% et complet à 70% à z<0.7 et déduis une masse pour chaque amas détecté à partir de la richesse. J’étudie alors l'évolution en décalage spectral des fonctions de luminosité des galaxies (GLF) de type précoce (ETG) et de type tardif (LTG) à différentes masses d’amas. J’observe que la GLF des ETGs faibles décroît à grand décalage spectral, la séquence rouge (RS) étant déjà formée à z~0.7, mais enrichie par de faibles ETG à z<0.7. Cela peut être dû à la suppression de la formation stellaire (“quenching”) des LTG dans l’amas ou à l'accrétion de faibles ETG pré-traités dans des groupes en chute sur l’amas. Pour étudier le rôle de ce pré-traitement, je détecte les filaments de la toile cosmique avec la méthode de Laigle et al (2018) et montre qu’elle est bien valide à la précision du CFHTLS. En comparant les distances aux amas AMASCFI des ETG et des LTG dans les filaments, je conclue que les filaments doivent être le siège de “quenching”. Cela pourrait être dû à l’étranglement des galaxies dans les groupes de galaxies mais plus de preuves sont nécessaires

    Détection de la toile cosmique

    No full text

    Evolution of the cluster optical galaxy luminosity function in the CFHTLS : breaking the degeneracy between mass and redshift

    No full text
    International audienceObtaining large samples of galaxy clusters is important for cosmology: cluster counts as a function of redshift and mass can constrain the parameters of our Universe. They are also useful in order to understand the formation and evolution of clusters. We develop an improved version of the Adami & MAzure Cluster FInder (AMACFI), now the Adami, MAzure & Sarron Cluster FInder (AMASCFI), and apply it to the 154 deg2 of the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey (CFHTLS) to obtain a large catalogue of 1371 cluster candidates with mass M200 > 1014 M⊙ and redshift z ≤ 0.7. We derive the selection function of the algorithm from the Millennium simulation, and cluster masses from a richness–mass scaling relation built from matching our candidates with X-ray detections. We study the evolution of these clusters with mass and redshift by computing the i′-band galaxy luminosity functions (GLFs) for the early-type (ETGs) and late-type galaxies (LTGs). This sample is 90% pure and 70% complete, and therefore our results are representative of a large fraction of the cluster population in these redshift and mass ranges. We find an increase in both the ETG and LTG faint populations with decreasing redshift (with Schechter slopes αETG = −0.65 ± 0.03 and αLTG = −0.95 ± 0.04 at z = 0.6, and αETG = −0.79 ± 0.02 and αLTG = −1.26 ± 0.03 at z = 0.2) and also a decrease in the LTG (but not the ETG) bright end. Our large sample allows us to break the degeneracy between mass and redshift, finding that the redshift evolution is more pronounced in high-mass clusters, but that there is no significant dependence of the faint end on mass for a given redshift. These results show that the cluster red sequence is mainly formed at redshift z > 0.7, and that faint ETGs continue to enrich the red sequence through quenching of brighter LTGs at z ≤ 0.7. The efficiency of this quenching is higher in large-mass clusters, while the accretion rate of faint LTGs is lower as the more massive clusters have already emptied most of their environment at higher redshifts.Key words: galaxies: clusters: general / galaxies: evolution / galaxies: luminosity function, mass function★ Based on observations obtained with MegaPrime/MegaCam, a joint project of CFHT and CEA/IRFU, at the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) which is operated by the National Research Council (NRC) of Canada, the Institut National des Sciences de l’Univers of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) of France, and the University of Hawaii. This work is based in part on data products produced at Terapix available at the Canadian Astronomy Data Centre as part of the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey, a collaborative project of NRC and CNRS.★★ The candidate cluster catalog is only available at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/613/A6

    Physical properties of more than one thousand brightest cluster galaxies detected in the Canada France Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey

    No full text
    International audienceBrightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) are very massive elliptical galaxies found at the centers of clusters. Their study gives clues on the formation and evolution of the clusters in which they are embedded. We analysed here in a homogeneous way the properties of a sample of more than one thousand BCGs in the redshift range 0.15 26 mag/arcsec2

    Physical properties of more than one thousand brightest cluster galaxies detected in the Canada France Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey

    No full text
    Brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) are very massive elliptical galaxies found at the centers of clusters. Their study gives clues on the formation and evolution of the clusters in which they are embedded. We analysed here in a homogeneous way the properties of a sample of more than one thousand BCGs in the redshift range 0.15 26 mag/arcsec2
    corecore